Stories that old oyster shells tell – part 1

Regular visitors to Jessica’s Nature Blog will no doubt have noticed the frequency with which photographs and articles are posted about the many variations to be seen in the shells of the British Native, Flat, or European Oyster, Ostrea edulis Linnaeus. Variation in oyster shells has been a subject that has interested me for many years – mainly because of its implication for the understanding of this particular marine mollusc in archaeological contexts. You can see these previous oyster shell posts by clicking here for the Oyster Variations category.

The following is the first instalment of an 8 part summary of the work I have been undertaking on Flat Oyster shell specimens from archaeological and present day contexts under the title Two thousand years of eating oysters in the UK: an archaeological perspective. The contents of these parts will be as follows:

Part 1 - Introduction and Background to the research

Part 2 – Methods

Part 3Caveats to analyses of the archaeological data

Part 4 – A few results: Size differences

Part 5 – A few results: Infestation differences

Part 6 – Exploitation models: the evidence considered as a whole

Part 7 – The general picture: Roman, Medieval, and Modern

Part 8 – Future work and References

 

Two thousand years of eating oysters in the UK:

an archaeological perspective

Part 1 

INTRODUCTION

Easily observable features in oyster shells from archaeological excavations can provide important evidence of where the oysters came from and the way they were exploited by man.

The shells of the European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) are immensely variable and reflect the natural environment in which the mollusc was living as well as the human activities associated with their collection, their use as food, and the method of their disposal. There have been extensive studies of large oyster middens from early periods worldwide, such as those at Ertebölle in Denmark, Mesolithic sites in Scotland, and later with the colonial period in the Americas. However, relatively little work has been undertaken on the more recent archaeological oyster deposits of the last two thousand years in the United Kingdom where mostly the quantities of shell are smaller and the sites can be inland as well as coastal, and both urban and rural. 

This article gives a very brief overview of the methods and preliminary results of investigations that have been made into oysters from excavations of these relatively recent archaeological sites in Britain – using observations of their macroscopic characteristics. It is based on a series of published and unpublished reports made to archaeological organisations, and also the doctoral thesis:  A study of the variation in oyster shells from archaeological sites and a discussion of oyster exploitation (Winder 1993).

BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH

Awareness of this potential research opportunity was raised in the 1970’s when a surge of construction development and its associated archaeological investigation uncovered large quantities of marine mollusc shells. An example of this was the excavation of Saxon Hamwic in Southampton where vast numbers of marine shells were recovered, mainly oyster, from domestic rubbish pits. The archaeologists had hundreds of large museum boxes full of mud-caked shells in store and wanted to know what to do with them.

Had these shells, they wanted to know, any potential for site interpretation? If so, could they be used to indicate how important marine molluscs were in the diet of the community? Where did the shellfish come from? Was it possible to establish the locations being fished in order to understand how far afield people were going for food and to suggest trade links and routes? How intensively were the shellfish beds being exploited – how much effort and organisation was invested in the activity?

Another aspect which intrigued archaeologists was whether some degree of oyster cultivation had been taking place. Were the oysters fished from natural (wild) beds or were they farmed, cultivated and subjected to more commercially orientated activities? It had always been assumed by historians that the Romans introduced oyster cultivation to Britain but could this be substantiated from the archaeological record?

The problem for the archaeo-malacologist is to discover what actually survives in the oyster shells that can possibly help to answer the questions posed by the archaeologists about the way people have exploited oysters in the past. Much of what is already known about the oyster and man relationship can be found in the general literature, particularly accounts from the 19th and early 20th century discussing eating, fishing and farming oysters. Despite some serious gaps in the periods covered, and not a few misunderstandings, this older literature contains some very useful information – including a quotation from the Roman poet Lucilius who said:

When I but see the oyster’s shell,

I look and recognise the river, marsh or mud,

Where it was raised.”

It is clear from allusions in the literature that, in fresh oyster shells at least, it is possible to observe variations that could be attributed to the place of origin. This idea was developed by Alfred Bell in the Essex Naturalist of 1921 where he meticulously described variations of British oyster shell shape, ascribing sub-species and variety names to specimens from different locations. Unfortunately, it seems likely that his descriptions may have been based on just a single specimen in some cases.

So, the task in hand was first to decide which particular surviving characters in the oyster shells might be useful in answering the questions posed by the archaeologists; and second, how to analyse the recorded information in a meaningful scientific way. This will be discussed next, in Part 2 of this account, which will briefly describe the basic methods used in the research.

  

N.B. Please leave a comment or e-mail me directly on winderjssc@aol.com if you would like to ask any questions or to have a free copy of the complete article sent to you as a pdf file. This article is just a very brief summary of my archaeological oyster research. A small selection of references to publications and reports will be provided with the article.

© Jessica Winder and Jessica’s Nature Blog, 2010. Unauthorised use and/or duplication of this material, including both text and photographs, without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jessica Winder and Jessica’s Nature Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

 Photographs in this blog are copyright property of Jessica Winder with all rights reserved

About these ads

7 thoughts on “Stories that old oyster shells tell – part 1

  1. Thanks, Matt. I have been meaning to write some archaeological oyster posts for the blog for some time. It’s a bit difficult to summarise over 3 decades of work but I hope people find the information interesting and useful. This first 8-part article is just a brief overview but I can add more details on specifics later- or in response to questions people might pose.

  2. Pingback: Posts about OYSTER SHELL VARIATIONS | Oysters etc.

  3. Hello Jessica, I’ve been digging in my garden and with some onion bottles and salt glazed pottery fragments I also found some oyster shells. Ifound your article fascinating!
    Kate, E Yorks

  4. Hello, Kate. Sounds like the oyster shells that you found are very old. How exciting to find things like that in your own garden. I’m glad you found my article interesting. I find oyster shells absolutely fascinating because they vary so much.

  5. Hello Jessica, I just visited oyster reefs in nothern Germany, found it very interesting and researching now a little bit. Can you tell me, how long european oysters (ostrea edulis) are existing on earth? How old are the oldest fossils, which were found?
    Greetings from Germany, Michaela

  6. Hello, Michaela
    I am not certain when Ostrea edulis first appeared in geologic history but the family to which the European Flat Oyster belongs, the Ostreidae, makes its first definite appearance in upper Triassic period deposits in the early Mesozoic era (which started about 225 million years ago). Species of the family Ostreidae became abundant in the Jurassic (195 – 136 million years ago) and Cretaceous (136 – 65 million years ago) periods of the middle and later Mesozoic era.
    Although some early fossil oyster shells are very like those of modern oysters, other forms developed in a variety of interesting and varied ways from the basic original shape – but these are all extinct now.
    The very useful little book about oysters from which I gleaned this information is Oysters by C.M. Yonge, The New Naturalist Series published by Collins, London 1960 and reprinted 1966. It is now out of print but it is still possible to buy second hand copies – it is a mine of information about oysters and oyster cultivation – particularly Ostrea edulis Linnaeus.
    Hope this helps to answer your question.
    Best wishes
    Jessica

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s